Nonprofit Issues: AG May Use Tainted Evidence In ‘Redacted v. Redacted’ Case

PA Supreme Court vacates opinion limiting use of information disclosed by defendant’s attorney

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has overruled the Commonwealth Court’s opinion in “Redacted v. Redacted” and allowed the state Attorney General to proceed against several charities and their officers using information allegedly disclosed by the charity’s attorney in violation of her obligation to preserve confidentiality.  The Supreme Court has said that evidence should be admitted in the case “based on established evidentiary principles and not the broader Code of Professional Conduct.”

Full article can be found here.